Why I’m not quitting peer review
Ed explains why, in contrast to Chris, he is going to continue peer-reviewing for academic journals.
academic publishing
Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 31st July 2017
Every Monday our authors provide a round-up of some of the most recently published peer reviewed articles from the field. We don’t cover everything, or even what’s most important – just a few papers that have interested the author. Visit… Read More »Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 31st July 2017
Sam Watson’s journal round-up for 10th April 2017
Every Monday our authors provide a round-up of some of the most recently published peer reviewed articles from the field. We don’t cover everything, or even what’s most important – just a few papers that have interested the author. Visit our Resources… Read More »Sam Watson’s journal round-up for 10th April 2017
Sam Watson’s journal round-up for 6th March 2017
Every Monday our authors provide a round-up of some of the most recently published peer reviewed articles from the field. We don’t cover everything, or even what’s most important – just a few papers that have interested the author. Visit our Resources… Read More »Sam Watson’s journal round-up for 6th March 2017
Health economics journals and negative findings
Recently, a number of health economics journals (henceforth HEJs) co-signed a statement about the publication of negative findings: The Editors of the health economics journals named below believe that well-designed, well-executed empirical studies that address interesting and important problems in… Read More »Health economics journals and negative findings