Every Monday our authors provide a round-up of some of the most recently published peer reviewed articles from the field. We don’t cover everything, or even what’s most important – just a few papers that have interested the author. Visit… Read More »Ewan Gray’s journal round-up for 27th April 2020
Every Monday our authors provide a round-up of some of the most recently published peer reviewed articles from the field. We don’t cover everything, or even what’s most important – just a few papers that have interested the author. Visit… Read More »Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 27th January 2020
Every Monday our authors provide a round-up of some of the most recently published peer reviewed articles from the field. We don’t cover everything, or even what’s most important – just a few papers that have interested the author. Visit… Read More »Sam Watson’s journal round-up for 7th August 2017
Editorial policies between the top medical journals differ. Some take a ‘crusading’ view and campaign on contemporary health issues. The BMJ falls into this camp, although this has sometimes led them to take political positions that might be contrary to… Read More »What’s going on at the New England Journal of Medicine?
Recently, a number of health economics journals (henceforth HEJs) co-signed a statement about the publication of negative findings: The Editors of the health economics journals named below believe that well-designed, well-executed empirical studies that address interesting and important problems in… Read More »Health economics journals and negative findings